On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 4:25 PM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On 23 May 2017, at 15:22, Marius Dumitru Florea < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 4:34 PM, Thomas Mortagne < > [email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> I would be more in favor of moving them to some extension than can be > >> easily installed if really needed. > >> > > > > +1 for moving to an extension that is not bundled by default. > > > Could you elaborate a bit? You’re ok to break existing users? What’s your > rationale? > AFAIK the Extension Manager doesn't delete pages without asking you first so you can choose to keep these pages (when asked). And if you don't pay attention when upgrading then you can restore them from the recycle bin or install the dedicated extension. Thanks, Marius > > Thanks > -Vincent > > > > > Thanks, > > Marius > > > > > >> > >> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 2:41 PM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>> Hi devs, > >>> > >>> We have this jira issue I created a while ago and I’d like to move > >> forward: > >>> https://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-13101 > >>> > >>> I have one question: > >>> Should we move the 4 pages into a legacy module in platform and bundle > >> it in XE or just remove them? > >>> > >>> My POV: > >>> We could consider the pages as APIs I guess and use the API strategy of > >> moving deprecated APIs to legacy. > >>> > >>> WDYT? > >>> > >>> Thanks > >>> -Vincent > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Thomas Mortagne > >> > >
