On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 4:53 PM, Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]> wrote:
> My only fear is that naming it "xwiki-9.5.zip" might make it look like > the recommended package while it's quite the opposite in practice. > Just putting it out there: * "xwiki-local-9.5.zip" * "xwiki-server-9.5.war" / "xwiki-hosted-9.5.war" Though I`m not sure we really need to go into these details, since the file extension says enough IMO and the download page will clarify this as well. Not to mention that an admin should know already the difference and that we`re not really addressing end-users nor even XWiki admin users here, but more sysadmins. Desktop users will surely go for the zip, and that`s our goal anyway. I`d keep it simple (i.e. "xwiki-9.5.zip"). Thanks, Eduard > On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 3:50 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea > <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1. I prefer xwiki-9.5.zip > > > > Thanks, > > Marius > > > > On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 1:25 PM, Thomas Mortagne < > [email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> Hi xwikiers, > >> > >> Eduard hard the idea of dynamically rename the files names of the > >> packages we publish on http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Download/ > >> page and use the refactoring to move XE features to a new platform > >> flavor as a good opportunity for this change. > >> > >> In more details the proposal is the following: > >> * name "xwiki-demo-9.5.zip" or "xwiki-9.5.zip" the standard > >> jetty/hsqldb package (the one which let you choose the flavor you want > >> to install) > >> * name "xwiki-9.5.war" the standard war package > >> * name "xwiki-classic-9.5.xip" the offline package containing XWiki > >> Classic flavor > >> > >> WDYT ? Other ideas ? > >> > >> +1 with a preference for "xwiki-demo-9.5.zip" over "xwiki-9.5.zip" to > >> make it more clear it's not a production oriented package. > >> > >> -- > >> Thomas Mortagne > >> > > > > -- > Thomas Mortagne >
