Re: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Agree on en_US vs en_GB

Mon, 04 Dec 2017 06:06:23 -0800 

+1 for en_US

2017-12-04 14:58 GMT+01:00 Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]>:

> +1 for en_US
>
> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 2:50 PM, Caleb James DeLisle <[email protected]> wrote:
> > +1 for en_US
> >
> > đŸ‡ș🇾
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Caleb
> >
> >
> > On 04/12/17 14:36, Manuel Smeria wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> +1 for en_US
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Manuel
> >>
> >> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Eduard Moraru <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> +1 for en_US
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Eduard
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Alex Cotiugă <
> [email protected]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> +1 for en_US
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Alex
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 2:38 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea <
> >>>> [email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> +1 for en_US
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi devs,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> By default the xwiki core committers maintain an “en” version of all
> >>>>>> translations and the other languages are left to the community to
> >>>>> maintain
> >>>>>> on l10n.xwiki.org
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> This mail is about deciding if our “en” version is “en_US” or
> >>> “en_GB”.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I propose that we standardize on “en_US”. for example
> >>>>> ApplicationResources.properties
> >>>>>> would correspond to en_US.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I also propose that we add en_GB on l10n so that the community could
> >>>>>> maintain a UK version if they want (it would fall back to en_US when
> >>>>> there
> >>>>>> are no translations, which is a good thing).
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> WDYT?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks
> >>>>>> -Vincent
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>
>
> --
> Thomas Mortagne
>



-- 
Guillaume Delhumeau ([email protected])
Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS
Committer on the XWiki.org project

Reply via email to