Some comparisons of vue.js with other Js fwk (beware, comparison done by vue.js but they tried to do it fairly and contacted the other guys) https://vuejs.org/v2/guide/comparison.html
There’s a comparison with knockout.js Thanks -Vincent > On 31 Jan 2018, at 11:08, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> On 31 Jan 2018, at 11:02, Guillaume Delhumeau >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi developers, >> >> We have never really decided what we will do with javascript frameworks in >> the future. Angular was a good candidate at some point, and we have even >> used it in the File Manager application. But then we have been very >> disappointed when we discovered the new versions of Angular were not >> retro-compatible. It may have been fixed since then, but I have not really >> followed the news about it. >> >> An other disadvantage of AngularJS is that it does too much. > > Another issue is that AngularJS doesn’t exist anymore. It’s now based on Type > script. > >> For example, >> they have a custom component system with a kind of dependencies injections. >> But we already can do that with RequireJS, for which it is the job. I have >> already started to split my JavaScript's code in several components thanks >> to RequireJS, and it works well. I think it's good to continue with >> RequireJS. It is currently our go-to library when we need to use jQuery, or >> even... Angular. >> >> I have worked a lot on a new version of the Nested Pages Migrator last >> year. The new version has never been released, because of blocking bugs on >> the XWiki Platform's core-side. But I now have some experience with the >> library I used: KnockoutJS. >> >> It's a very simple library that does only one job and does it well: two-way >> data-bindings. It plays well with RequireJS and it does not re-invent its >> own component mechanism. The HTML code is not polluted by non-valid tags >> (instead it uses "data-" properties and special HTML comments). The >> documentation is extremely clear, and tutorials are great. >> >> It's not the most popular library out there, but it's stable and still >> alive. The trends are changing so quickly in the JS world (React was the >> star not so long ago, but now it is hated because of a license change...), >> but Knockout is still there. If the project dies, I think it will be easier >> to replace it with an other simple library than a big "framework". >> >> This is not a proposal or a vote, but only a feedback about this library. > > Thanks that’s good feedback! > > There are other libs out there are getting tractions (there are new ones all > the times in the JS land ;)). For example vue.js looks nice too. > > Thanks > -Vincent > >> You can test it there: http://knockoutjs.com/ >> >> Thanks, >> >> -- >> Guillaume Delhumeau ([email protected]) >> Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS >> Committer on the XWiki.org project
