+1

Thanks,
Marius

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 12:49 PM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <
[email protected]> wrote:

> +1
>
> Thanks,
> Caty
>
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 12:48 PM, Eduard Moraru <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Sounds interesting,
> > +1.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Eduard
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 12:26 PM, Thomas Mortagne <
> > [email protected]
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 9:30 AM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > Hi devs,
> > > >
> > > > As part of the STAMP research project, we’ve developed a new tool
> > > (Descartes, based on Pitest) to measure the quality of tests. It
> > generates
> > > a mutation score for your tests, defining how good the tests are.
> > Technical
> > > Descartes performs some extreme mutations on the code under test (e.g.
> > > remove content of void methods, return true for methods returning a
> > > boolean, etc - See https://github.com/STAMP-project/pitest-descartes).
> > If
> > > the test continues to pass then it means it’s not killing the mutant
> and
> > > thus its mutation score decreases.
> > > >
> > > > So in short:
> > > > * Jacoco/Clover: measure how much of the code is tested
> > > > * Pitest/Descartes: measure how good the tests are
> > > >
> > > > Both provide a percentage value.
> > > >
> > > > I’m proposing to compute the current mutation scores for
> xwiki-commons
> > > and xwiki-rendering and fail the build when new code is added that
> reduce
> > > the mutation score threshold (exactly the same as our jacoco threshold
> > and
> > > strategy).
> > > >
> > > > I consider this is an experiment to push the limit of software
> > > engineering a bit further. I don’t know how well it’ll work or not. I
> > > propose to do the work and test this for over 2-3 months and see how
> well
> > > it works or not. At that time we can then decide whether it works or
> not
> > > (i.e whether the gains it brings are more important than the problems
> it
> > > causes).
> > > >
> > > > Here’s my +1 to try this out.
> > > >
> > > > Some links:
> > > > * pitest: http://pitest.org/
> > > > * descartes: https://github.com/STAMP-project/pitest-descartes
> > > > * http://massol.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Blog/
> ControllingTestQuality
> > > > * http://massol.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Blog/
> > MutationTestingDescartes
> > > >
> > > > If you’re curious, you can see a screenshot of a mutation score
> report
> > > at http://massol.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Blog/
> > > MutationTestingDescartes/report.png
> > > >
> > > > Please cast your votes.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > > -Vincent
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Thomas Mortagne
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to