Thank you.

On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 7:51 PM Thomas Mortagne <thomas.morta...@xwiki.com>
wrote:

> I removed the manual upgrade of the flavor since it does not make much
> sense to keep it especially for an upgrade since there is very little
> chance than anyone ever upgrade to something older than the supported
> branches.
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 5:13 PM Ecaterina Moraru (Valica)
> <vali...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I've replaced the original version with the proposal. Let me know if
> there
> > are issues. We can fix them or Rollback.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Caty
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 6:27 PM Thomas Mortagne <
> thomas.morta...@xwiki.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I agree that your new organization of the page makes it more clear.
> > >
> > > I would replace "Upgrading the wiki pages" by "Upgrading the flavor"
> > > since the flavor actually bring more that wiki pages.
> > >
> > > Method 2.B should probably be completely removed since it does not
> > > make sense anymore in the currently supported branches.
> > > On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 4:58 PM Ecaterina Moraru (Valica)
> > > <vali...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi devs,
> > > >
> > > > Since I didn't understood a lot of things the first time I've read
> the
> > > > Update documentation, I've made a proposal on improving the grouping
> of
> > > the
> > > > content.
> > > >
> > > > You can see:
> > > > - The original
> > > >
> https://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Documentation/AdminGuide/Upgrade
> > > > - The proposal
> > > >
> > >
> https://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/Upgrade/SimplerUpgrade/Draft
> > > >
> > > > Since the content is highly technical, if you find mistakes or want
> to
> > > add
> > > > stuff, please just edit them yourself. I've just took the existing
> > > content
> > > > and reorganize it.
> > > >
> > > > Let me know what you think about this version and if we can replace
> the
> > > > current version with the draft.
> > > >
> > > > Thank you,
> > > > Caty
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Thomas Mortagne
> > >
>
>
>
> --
> Thomas Mortagne
>

Reply via email to