Another point: * There are only recurring donations. I believe we also need one shot ones, don’t you think?
Thanks -Vincent > On 19 Mar 2019, at 13:46, Vincent Massol <vinc...@massol.net> wrote: > > Hi Caty and all, > >> On 19 Mar 2019, at 12:11, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <vali...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> Please vote on the Tiers we should have on XWiki's OpenCollective page >> https://goo.gl/forms/qTDsxt1GvpU0ET3n2 > > * What is a member? > * For me the Tshirt is not part of the title but it’s a reward. > * Issue sponsor isn’t defined well enough. You seem to indicate 1 issue only… > which is low. Is it 1 issue per release? Also needs some limits on the > complexity (such as < 2 days of work). I would put 2000 euros for 2 days of > work since the goal is not to do service work but to sponsor the sofware and > by doing so you get a reward. So it has to be higher than if you were just > paying for an issue. So I would put 2000 euros for max of 2 days issues per > month. 1000 euros for 1 day is also possible but reduces a lot the type of > issues that can be taken. > * For all of them I find the description too weak. We need to explain where > the money goes in more details IMO. Also what about XWiki SAS’s current > sponsoring. Why would anyone want to give when XWiki SAS gives already? This > is not explained. > * Support Sponsor is interesting but it should be 1000 euros per month and be > limited to 2 hours IMO. > > Regarding Issue sponsor and Support Sponsor there’s an issue though. It’s not > clear where the money goes and what it’ll be used for. Imagine, for example, > that Clemens does an Issue sponsor. Does some part of the money go to him? If > not, what is it used for and how does it benefit Clemens globally? > > So I really think we need to explain what the money is going to be used in > details, on top of what XWiki SAS already sponsors. That should be our first > step IMO. > > Thanks > -Vincent > >> Thanks, >> Caty >> >> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 6:26 PM Vincent Massol <vinc...@massol.net> wrote: >> >>> I’d say that we should start with opencollective for now. >>> >>> We can always add more later on. But the importance is to get started. >>> >>> Thanks >>> -Vincent >>> >>>> On 13 Mar 2019, at 16:39, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <vali...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> For the record: OpenCollective's 'competitor' >>> https://communitybridge.org, >>>> still in early access, but launched by Linux Foundation ( >>>> https://www.linuxfoundation.org/) >>>> >>>> We could use the CommunityBridge in parallel with OpenCollective. >>>> >>>> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 12:20 PM Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) < >>>> vali...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Ping >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 5:22 PM Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) < >>>>> vali...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi devs, >>>>>> >>>>>> This is a proposal for the content we would have if we were to create >>> an >>>>>> OpenCollective account for XWiki. >>>>>> Take a look at >>>>>> https://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/XWikiOpenCollective >>>>>> >>>>>> The issues we need to solve / validate are: >>>>>> A. Decide on the URL name (xwiki is already taken by XWiki SAS) >>>>>> B. See if XWiki SAS can act like our Fiscal host >>>>>> C. Validate the tiers and content >>>>>> >>> https://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/XWikiOpenCollective#HTiers >>>>>> (we might need more details on how the "Bug Fixer" works in case we >>> agree >>>>>> to it) >>>>>> >>>>>> Let me know what you think, >>>>>> Caty >>>>>> >>>>>> >>> >>> >
