On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 5:33 PM Simon Urli <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Marius,
>
> On 25/07/2019 16:22, Marius Dumitru Florea wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 11:39 AM Simon Urli <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi everyone,
> >>
> >> I'm currently working on improving security on XWiki comments. We
> >> already use a restricted mode in our comments but that does not cover
> >> every possible case. In order to improve it we should also filter out
> >> some part of the html when using the html  macro.
> >>
> >
> > Is the HTML macro needed in comments? Do you have a real use case for
> this?
> > Wouldn't it be more simple to completly forbid HTML and script macros in
> > comments?
>
> That's also an option, but potentially more breaking.
>
> IMO the decision was already taken a while ago with
>
> https://github.com/xwiki-contrib/syntax-markdown/commit/907dc0630a1b7cad4292c1472deb7ae4d68c66ae


I don't understand why a change in markdown syntax (contrib project) can be
considered as decision for the XWiki Project. But anyway, any decision can
be revisited.

Again, do you have a real use case where you need HTML macro in comments?


>
> which forces to use html macro with clean option when used in restricted
> mode, but does not prevent to use html macro at all. Contrary to the
> script macro which have all been disabled on the following commit:
>
> https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-platform/commit/544d290a37cf86dff27aa7bc12be3f6a219f1508
>
> Simon
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Marius
> >
> >
> >>
> >> I propose:
> >>
> >>     (a) that we use a configurable whitelist of HTML attributes that
> >> would be allowed in the output HTML: all the other attributes would be
> >> filtered out.
> >>
> >>     (b) that the HTML macro is put in restricted mode for users who do
> >> not have scripting rights.
> >>
> >> For (a) I'm hesitating between a whitelist or a blacklist: I assume a
> >> blacklist would be shorter but there's also more risk of missing
> >> something. On the contrary a configurable whitelist doesn't prevent
> >> administrator to accept more than what we give in standard.
> >>
> >> A first whitelist could be (taken from:
> >>
> >>
> https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-platform/pull/122/files#diff-c33fcb5dca86b155928768dd6e6fbf7eR146
> >> )
> >> alt, class, height, id, name, rel, scope, style, target, title, width
> >>
> >> Note that href is not included in this list for example.
> >>
> >> WDYT?
> >>
> >> Simon
> >>
> >> --
> >> Simon Urli
> >> Software Engineer at XWiki SAS
> >> [email protected]
> >> More about us at http://www.xwiki.com
> >>
>
> --
> Simon Urli
> Software Engineer at XWiki SAS
> [email protected]
> More about us at http://www.xwiki.com
>

Reply via email to