On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 02:01:42PM +0000, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> commit 929d0360bd2049fd77f864a7db0687e05695e548
> Author: Osamu Aoki <[email protected]>
> Date:   Sun Sep 27 01:00:09 2015 +0900
> 
>     control: gnupg/gnupg2, gpgv/gpgv2
>     
>     Closes: #788414

As I stated[0], this isn't just a matter of changing the control file.
There's only one script that supports gpg2 and none that support gpgv2,
where as there are 11 scripts that use gpg and 2 that use gpgv.

Your work in the multitar branch may have fixed one such script to honor
both, but that's not enough to consider gnupg2/gpgv2 a valid alternative
package.

If you want to continue with that work, great, but please also update
the tool descriptions in debian/control and README to reflect the
alternatives.

[0]: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=788414#20

Cheers,
-- 
James
GPG Key: 4096R/331BA3DB 2011-12-05 James McCoy <[email protected]>

_______________________________________________
devscripts-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devscripts-devel

Reply via email to