* Osamu Aoki <os...@debian.org>, 2015-10-10, 17:16:
Some time back licensecheck grew a dependency on Dpkg::IPC [1], which
on Fedora causes the "devscripts-minimal" package (which includes
licensecheck) to pull in dpkg. I'd like to propose the patch below to
reduce the dependency load:
[...]
I do not know how OP wishes to use this code on Fedora but if we look
at the devscripts package as a whole, the OP's claim "grew a
dependency" does not make sense. The use of Dpkg::IPC was meant to
avoid growing dependency.
Look at the package:
$ cd scripts
$ fgrep 'use Dpkg::IPC' *.pl
debdiff.pl:use Dpkg::IPC;
debuild.pl:use Dpkg::IPC;
dscverify.pl:use Dpkg::IPC;
mk-build-deps.pl:use Dpkg::IPC;
mk-origtargz.pl:use Dpkg::IPC;
uscan.pl:use Dpkg::IPC;
All these programs work work with Debian packages, so they are not very
useful for an average Fedora developer. Also, if you are going to work
with Debian packages, you will probably need dpkg-dev (and therefore
dpkg Perl modules) anyway.
licensecheck.pl:use Dpkg::IPC qw(spawn);
This script is not Debian-specific at all. In Fedora it was put in a
separate package ("devscripts-minimal"), along with other
non-Debian-specific devscripts programs. This binary package didn't have
dependency on dpkg Perl modules until now.
I think it would in spirit of SC§2 to avoid adding runtime
dependencies that are unlikely to be satisfied on non-Debian systems to
scripts that are generally useful on such systems.
If the wishlist bug comes with patch which enables either Dpkg::IPC or
IPC::Run after checking their availability, that may be implemented if
security concerns are not there.
This would be my preferred option, too.
I might write a patch implementing it later, but feel free to beat me to
it. :)
--
Jakub Wilk
_______________________________________________
devscripts-devel mailing list
devscripts-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devscripts-devel
