On 06/12/15 00:51, James McCoy wrote:
would rather not touch VCs-specific scripts
===========================================
That's fine. We don't need complete coverage. :) If someone else is
interested in it, they can do it.
Reflecting on it what I was picking up on here is that in the RFH bug
report there is a comment about making the scripts more coherent. Well
it strikes me that they are at their most incoherent in the VCS scripts.
So I thought about it and then thought, "nah nah not for me".
If I am not willing to touch the code of a script, then I am not eager
to look at the bash completion. More generally if someone actually wants
to make them more coherent they have to come up with a vision of what
that would look like and put a lot of work into it. Coherence is an
indication of intelligent design not evolution. Just ask your appendix!
debrelease (err ...dput-ng?)
Not sure what the parenthetical statement is supposed to mean.
The first point here is that now we have two completing packages "dput"
and "dput-ng" and so debrelease presumably needs updating at least in
the man page.
Secondly both rival packages provide "dcut" but neither provide bash
completion, although WE do! That looks like a mess though I am not sure
that the onus is on devscripts to clean that one up.
_______________________________________________
devscripts-devel mailing list
devscripts-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devscripts-devel
