Hi, On 03/03/16 at 21:55 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: > Hi again, > > I have a second thought. UDD used to work around --dehs <errors> > problem. Now you do not need to do so. Let's make thing simpler. > > Since I never coded in ruby, you must give some break for me making > buggy code but attached patch (after bug fixes if needed) should address > issues on UDD web page. > > This simplifies UDD code and keeps uscan away from another bloat.
Thanks for your patch! I've integrated it. Now I have 2641 packages with errors in unstable, which looks is more in line with what's expected. Looking at the errors, uscan doesn't seem to use the <errors> tag, but instead output its errors in the <warnings> tag. (but that was already the case). The most popular errors are: 1065 /no matching files for watch line/ 982 /failed: (400|404|401|403|406|410|500|502|503|521|301|302)/ 514 /uscan returned an empty output/ 23 /No good upstream filename found after removing/ 21 /Filename pattern missing version delimiters/ 12 /no matching hrefs for pattern/ 5 /debian\/watch is an obsolete version 1 watch file/ 4 /ailed to parse XML: / 3 /potentially unsafe or malformed uversionmangle pattern:/ 3 /malformed opts=... in watch file, skipping line/ 2 /potentially unsafe or malformed dversionmangle pattern:/ 1 /unrecognised option fullsourcemangle/ 1 /Unknown protocol in debian\/watch, skipping/ 1 /In debian\/watch, potentially unsafe or malformed filenamemangle pattern/ 1 /debian\/watch ended with \\; skipping last line/ 1 /could not open debian\/watch: No such file or directory/ 1 /Can't determine protocol and site in/ Thanks again, I'm closing this bug. Lucas _______________________________________________ devscripts-devel mailing list devscripts-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devscripts-devel
