On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 08:32:21PM +0000, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Tue, 22 Nov 2016 at 15:05:10 -0500, James McCoy wrote: > > Shouldn't it always be kept in the resulting changes file? It's just > > build metadata like the changes/dsc files. > > Hmm. I think it would be unexpected to include the buildinfo in a > source-only changes file (mergechanges --source), since (per > <https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=763822>) > it is metadata about a binary build.
Yet “dpkg-buildpackage -S” does produce a *_source.buildinfo. That's actually the first time I've seen anything other than *$datestamp_$hash.buildinfo... oh, dpkg 1.8.15 seems to have changed the naming of the files. Ok, feel free to commit your proposed patch if it includes handling for _source (or let me know if you'd prefer me to do so). Cheers, -- James GPG Key: 4096R/91BF BF4D 6956 BD5D F7B7 2D23 DFE6 91AE 331B A3DB _______________________________________________ devscripts-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devscripts-devel
