On 29 July 2016 at 19:50, Lalatendu Mohanty <[email protected]> wrote: > On 07/27/2016 10:06 PM, Rick Wagner wrote: > > Hello DevTools SMEs, > > We are seeing a few more CDK support cases, most seem to indicate curiosity > and tire-kicking. We also have a case with a customer going a step further. > > The customer in question wants to use the CDK to develop on the desktop and > deploy to an Enterprise OpenShift. > > It's my understanding that there are two primary schemes: > > - Push source code (perhaps using a tag like 'prod') to a source repository > accessed by the enterprise OpenShift environment. (Be it QE, Prod, > whatever). > - Push docker images to an external repository accessed by the enterprise > OpenShift. > > > These ideas perfectly makes sense to me. Any organization going through the > DevOps route would need this work flows. > > > There are nuances like use of WebHooks vs. manual pulls, Jenkins doing the > monitoring, etc. > > This seems a really foundational use case for the CDK, so it seems like > something we'd want to document. I've been discussing this with Robert > Kratky but wanted to open the discussion to get more viewpoints (and > especially more users that have experience.) > > > These needs to ironed out , needs testing and then documentation. > > > Of special interest: > > - The customer is indicating a desire for some widget on the CDK-supplied > OpenShift UI so he can 'push' artifacts to the enterprise OpenShift's docker > repository. > > +1 . Developer tool should help move things in to the DevOps workflow. The > pipeline work going on in OpenShift might align here. Need to cross check.
I think the CD pipeline (i.e. pushing source) should be our recommended approach here. > > - The customer is asking if Docker version is relevant. (i.e. the CDK's > version of Docker may need to align with the external image repository's > version. True or False?) > > > The only requirement I think is the docker version should support the image > format present in external image repository. I do not think this would be > problem if they stick to OpenShift Enterprise. > > > Please consider, add thoughts to the discussion. > > Thank you, > > Rick > > > _______________________________________________ > Devtools mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/devtools > > > > _______________________________________________ > Devtools mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/devtools > _______________________________________________ Devtools mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/devtools
