Thanks for that, Todd. I'll put together a note to an OpenShift Lab stakeholder, I'll copy you on it.
Rick On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Todd Mancini <[email protected]> wrote: > This sounds like it's smacking into the use case for OpenShift Lab, so we > really should coordinate with the OpenShift team to make sure this is going > down a path they want. We can take offline with them. > > On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Rick Wagner <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hello DevTools CDK SMEs, >> >> We have a customer support case [1] where the user wishes to install the >> CDK and then make it available for team development purposes. >> >> They'd like to allow developers on different machines to connect to the >> OpenShift instance using their office VLan's address of 192.168.x.x instead >> of the default 10.1.x.x. >> >> So, a few questions: >> >> - Considering the active Xip.io thread in SE-JBoss, should we consider >> this a core use-case? (With accompanying documentation?) >> >> - Is this a recommended use? It seems the CDK is more of a 'personal' >> development environment than a 'team' development environment. Should this >> use be discouraged? >> >> - Do we have any specific words of advice for this user? >> >> Thanks in advance for all thoughts offered. As usual, CEE will dutifully >> KCS the tips provided. >> >> Rick >> >> [1] https://access.redhat.com/support/cases/01674763 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Devtools mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/devtools >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Devtools mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/devtools
