Hi, first thanks to Jason for the nice work on upgrading our docs.
In this case John its also relevant to look at the new "attribute" type categories. The categories as you know them are now referred to as type "disaggregation" - the new type is referred to as "attribute" and should be linked to a data set. This allows you to create a category of type attribute called "Implementing Partner", where you can include category options for each of your partners. Remember to tick "use as data dimension" and dimension type "attribute" when creating the category. Then wrap this category in a category combination also called "Implementing partner" and assign this category combination to the data set where you collect your partner oriented data (in edit data set screen > category combination). Now when opening data entry you will see that you must, in addition to org unit/data set/period, select the partner that should be "attributed" the data, before the data entry form appears. After entering data and running analytics, the partner dimension will also become available in pivot table and visualizer for data analysis. All this is available in 2.14. In 2.15 we will introduce more features like access control per category option (preventing partners to see each others data) and category option groups + group sets (like Jason indicates, for further classification and analysis of category options, for instance by funding agency). We are interested in feedback on these features so let us know how it goes. regards, Lars On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 7:50 AM, John Ojo <jn...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Hi Jason, > > Thank you so much for the quick response. Will look at the documentation. > Many thanks, > > John > > > *John Ojo MD, FMCPH* > Accra, Ghana. > Mobile: +233 234691626+233 234691626 > Skype: Johnojo > Email: jn...@yahoo.com <j...@corridor-sida.org> > <http://www.corridor-sida.org/> > > > On Wednesday, February 19, 2014 8:56 PM, Jason Pickering < > jason.p.picker...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi John, > You should probably consider using the new feature of the category option > group sets. This allows a mechanism to have multiple reports for a single > organisation unit and time period, which would be disaggregated by for > instance, "Implementing partner" and "Project". You can take a look at the > new documentation > here<http://apps.dhis2.org/ci/job/dhis-documentation-en/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/*zip*/archive.zip> > which describes how to set this up. > > The problem with the approach which you propose is that the maintenance of > the orgunit hierarchy becomes complicated if you are dealing with a lot of > IPs. If it is a small number, it may be possible, but has proven to be a > big headache in other implementations where this type of information needs > to be recorded. > > Best regards, > Jason > > > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 1:21 AM, John Ojo <jn...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > Hi All, > > I am designing a database for an organization that works with multiple > local NGOs (14 NGOs in all) as the Implementing Partners (IPs) for the said > organization. > > There are 40 districts in all. For the sake of this description, I will > name the districts as district_1, district_2, district_3, and so on. and > the IPs as IP1, IP2, IP3, and so on. > Each of the IPs works in multiple districts; for example IP1 and IP2 each > works in all the 40 districts. > > Each IP specializes in one program area. For example, IP1 does only > HIV/AIDS while IP2 focuses on Gender & Human Rights. > The organization needs to be able to know the results of each IP from each > district every month. > > I am therefore planning to set up the organisation unit names in the DHIS > 2 database as follows: > For IP1 and IP2, I'm considering the following orgUnit names: > > District_1 > IP1_d1 > IP2_d1 > > District_2 > IP1_d2 > IP2_d2 > > > District_3 > IP1_d3 > IP2_d3 > . > . > . > District_40 > IP1_d40 > IP2_d40 > > I would appreciate suggestions on how to handle this piece, especially if > there's a better way than this approach and would also like to hear from > anyone who had had to deal with this type of situation and how they handled > the orgUnit names. > > Thank you so much. > > John > > > *John Ojo MD, FMCPH * > Accra, Ghana. > Mobile: +233 234691626+233 234691626 > Skype: Johnojo > Email: jn...@yahoo.com <j...@corridor-sida.org> > <http://www.corridor-sida.org/> > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-devs > Post to : dhis2-devs@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-devs > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-users > Post to : dhis2-us...@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-users > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-devs Post to : dhis2-devs@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-devs More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
