Le Sun, Sep 08, 2002, � 07:00:55PM +0300, Tor Lillqvist a �crit:
> Cyrille Chepelov writes:
> > I've got a single problem to apply it: patch rejects it.
>
> Umm. Strange. The diff was produced with a standard cvs diff -u2.
> Would it be OK if I committed it myself?
Yes, with one restriction on the "ieeefp.h" and isinf() stuff: this workaround has
already applied elsewhere, perhaps doing it only once in common is better.
(I use "cvs diff -urN")
> > For the rest, I agree entirely with you, especially on the DLL
> > issue (though it would be more profitable to fix the damn Win32
> > loader ;-) )
>
> Anybody else care to comment? Would it be OK to turn libdia into a
> shared library also on Unix, even if nothing except the dia executable
> would use it directly?
I'm testing that right now. We'll probably have to warn the distributors
about that, though.
-- Cyrille
--
_______________________________________________
Dia-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dia-list
