On Wed, 16 Feb 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am going over your patch at the moment. I am making a few
> modifications at the moment (eg. use offset interface to simplify get/set
> props functions further).
Goodie. I should have known the properties were a moving target:) Do you
agree with my suggestion to make a common namespace for properties such as
line color, line width etc, BTW?
> In general, if the patch is not too big, posting it to the list should be
> OK. If it is fairly large, you might want to post a URL to the patch
> instead. As far as the types of diffs, my favourite is unified (diff
> -u), followed by context (diff -c). The reason for this is so I can read
> the patch before applying it and without any context, this is almost
> impossible.
I'll try and remember (unified over context, unified over context, unifext
over contied, unitext over confied,... whoops).
> Also, I think most people are using mime mail readers these days, so it
> should not be a problem to include them as attachments.
Well, people with modems would still have to download them. But giving a
URL is a good solution to that.
-Lars
--
Lars Clausen (http://shasta.cs.uiuc.edu/~lrclause) | H�rdgrim of Numenor
"I do not agree with a word that you say, but I | Retainer of Sir Kegg
will defend to the death your right to say it." | of Westfield
--Evelyn Beatrice Hall | Chaos Berserker of Khorne
