Reminder that today's the official deadline for replying to the
petitions that are asking the FCC to reverse its opening of 50
MHz of spectrum (3650-3700 MHz) for sharing by nonprofits,
commercial WISPs, and all others...
Here's a helpful blog entry on the subject and further below is
my previous message.
http://www.saschameinrath.com/node/198
In regard to that deadline, if you don't have a chance to file by
tonight (e.g., if you need approval by your organization's
board), please do file a comment when you get the chance if the
Commission hasn't made a decision yet (and that may take a
while). Immediately below is a helpful reminder sent by an FCC
attorney to the AFCN list.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [AFCN Members] 3650-3700 MHz Spectrum Comment Deadline this
Thursday
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 14:42:32 -0700 (PDT)
From: Robert Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just remember, if you dont make the deadline, you can
still influence the outcome. The FCC accepts input
after the deadline pursuant to their Ex Parte rules.
You can meet staff in person or you can file after
deadline comments simply by checking the "Ex Parte"
box in the Electronic Comment Filing System. See
http://www.cybertelecom.org/faqs/fcc101.htm#exp
B
==============================================
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 09:42:45 -0400 (EDT)
From: Stephen Ronan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: The Digital Divide Network discussion group
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [DDN] Urgent FCC matter potentially affecting Digital
Divide in US
As you may know, back in March, the FCC made an an innovative and
helpful decision to open up a new band of spectrum for community
wireless folks and others to use: the 3650 to 3700 MHz band. The
plan was for there to be an unlimited number of licensees
throughout the country, with an easy online application process,
no eligibility restrictions to speak of, and with all licensees
having a mutual obligation to cooperate and avoid harmful
interference to each other. That band is currently used for Fixed
Satellite Stations and they would continue to use it in and near
their facilities which are mostly on the East and West Coasts,
and exclusion zones around those facilities would prevent much of
any usage nearby. For that reason, some coastal cities, such as
New York, Philadelphia and the Bay Area would not benefit much if
at all from the new rules, but the great majority of the
geographic area of the country including rural areas would
benefit and many major metropolitan areas such as Albuquerque,
Atlanta, Austin, Boston, Chicago, Cleveland, Columbus, Detroit,
Houston, Kansas City, Las Vegas, Milwaukee, New Orleans, Oklahoma
CIty, Phoenix, San Antonio, and Tucson.
A map on page 66 of the FCC's Order clarifies the areas that are
outside of the FSS exclusion areas.
<http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-56A1.pdf>
The power limits and other aspects of that FCC decision would
make it much easier for free and low-cost networks to be deployed
that could reach greater distances, with radio signals carrying
broadband Internet access through walls and ceilings and other
obstacles more effectively than low-power WiFi devices. More
detail here:
<http://makeashorterlink.com/?N13563D8B>
Unfortunately, after the decision was issued, there was a time
period for those opposing the decision to file a Request for
Reconsideration and nine parties have done so including some,
such as Intel and Motorola, who are asking for there to be severe
restrictions on who can use the spectrum. Rather than opening it
up for anyone to use, Motorola is requesting that the 50 MHz of
spectrum be divided into two 25 MHz blocks with each auctioned
off to the highest bidder. Intel and a couple of others signed
another petition calling for all that spectrum also to be divided
among two exclusive licensees in most major metropolitan areas
such as the ones listed in the first paragraph above. And the
Wireless Communications Association called for half the 50 MHz of
spectrum to be made available to just one exclusive licensee in
each rural and urban area that isn't already excluded by the
presence of Fixed Satellite Stations.
The filing of the Petitions for Reconsideration and their
availability for review was published in the Federal Register
last week, setting off a fifteen day period for opposition to the
Petitions for Reconsideration to be filed. Those comments are due
by August 11 (there still may be an opportunity to file comments
"ex parte" after that but it's better for them to arrive before
the deadline if possible).
I hope those of you in the U.S. will consider filing at least a
brief comment thanking the FCC for their original decision to
open up the spectrum for nonprofit community groups and all
others to share while committing to not interfere with each
other's networks, and in your comment opposing the attempt to
instead have much or all of the spectrum auctioned off to the
highest bidder.
You can review previous comments that have been filed, including
the Petitions for Reconsideration at the FCC web site by entering
04-151 in the search bar in the top left corner at www.fcc.gov.
See how easy it is to file a comment...
just enter 04-151 in the proceeding number here:
<http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/upload_v2.cgi>
complete the brief form, selecting Reply to Petition for
Reconsideration in the drop down box at the bottom, and then
either upload your comment or type it into the text entry box...
Just a couple of paragraphs identifying your and/or your
organization's interest in equitable access to technology,
thanking the FCC for opening up the spectrum for uses that can
bridge the digital divide, and then opposing the idea that the
rights to the spectrum would instead be auctioned to the highest
bidder would be a huge help.
- Steve Ronan
_______________________________________________
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE
in the body of the message.
