Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 3:44 AM, mpt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Great stuff, but I have some trouble with the binding lib.
Good! Because I wasn't ;)
1. If I don't wrap a constructor, I get an error:
minid/bind.d(1101): static assert "Cannot call default constructor for class Foo;
please wrap a constructor explicitly"
Fixed.
Fix compiles for the explicitly defined ctor, but not for the default.
This code gives:
minid/bind.d(1110): Error: no super class constructor for Foo
import minid.bind;
import minid.api;
class Foo {}
void main() {
MDVM vm;
auto t = openVM(&vm);
loadStdlibs(t);
WrapGlobals!(
WrapType!(
Foo, "Foo"
)
)(t);
}
3. I can't find an obvious way to initialize global variables, so I try
superPush, which gives a runtime error:
You're actually doing it right, unless you wanted to instantiate the
wrapped MiniD class, in which case it'd be more like:
pushGlobal(t, "Foo"); // get the global class Foo
pushNull(t); // make room for 'this'
rawCall(t, -2, 1); // call the class to instantiate it (1 return
for the instance)
newGlobal(t, "myfoo"); // save it in the global myfoo
I can't see the difference between superPush-created myfoo and one
created by your example. superPush doc says it creates MiniD-converted
objects, but they're not usable.
superPush(t, new Foo());
newGlobal(t, "myfoo");
runString(t, "myfoo.Call();");
This gives:
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]/extern/minid/minid/bind.d(1397):
Invalid 'this' parameter passed to method Foo.Call"
Your example works, but it's not what I need. I want to create the Foo
object in D myself and pass it to MiniD and call its methods.
Ideally, I'd like to have/write a function like
void setGlobal(Type)(MDThread* t, char[] name, Type value) to create and
modify global variables.
