On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 06:34:11 -0400, Steve Teale
<steve.te...@britseyeview.com> wrote:
Jacob Carlborg Wrote:
Steve Teale wrote:
> Michel Fortin Wrote:
>
>> On 2009-04-19 15:19:24 -0400, Steve Teale
<steve.te...@britseyeview.com> said:
>>
>>> This is incomplete at this point, but there's a working example. I
have
>>> to break off now and do some building work. You can find
documentation
>>> and a zip file (currently it is Windows only, DMD2.026, and Phobos)
at
>>> http://www.britseyeview.com/dcat/.
>>>
>>> It works with Apache2, and uses the AJP13 protocol like Tomcat.
>> Interesting. Just as I was thinking of creating a web app in D.
>>
>> What's the license?
>>
>> --
>> Michel Fortin
>> michel.for...@michelf.com
>> http://michelf.com/
>>
> Hmm, forgot about that stuff, BSD maybe - suggest one please.
>
I suggest Boost or zlib/libpng.
I realize there are legal subtleties in all these licenses. In your
view, why is Boost better than BSD? Just curious.
BSD requires all copies (including binary code) to carry a copy of the
licence (i.e. in an about box, product documentation, etc). The Boost or
zlib/libpng licences don't require binary copies to carry a copy of the
licence. D runtime / Phobos use a combination of Boost and zlib/libpng
(mainly libpng). Commercial companies can have issues with the
requirements of the BSD licence.
