Tomas Lindquist Olsen Wrote: > On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 12:44 AM, Eldar Insafutdinov > <e.insafutdi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Eldar Insadutdinov Wrote: > > > >> Another release of QtD is out. This time, it's Linux-only because OPTLINK > >> refuses to link the project with debug info on Windows (see bug > >> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2436). If anybody wants QtD > >> on Windows, please keep pushing Walter until he does something with > >> OPTLINK (bury it). Voting for the bug may help, too. > >> I would repeat once again the request, that was raised here numerous of > >> times, Walter, please change object file format, for me the ones used by > >> MSVC or MinGW would be just fine. > >> > >> In this release: > >> > >> * Lots of bugfixes > >> * Switched to Qt 4.5 > >> * ldc supported (for both X86 and X86-64) > >> * All imports inside Qt are now public to avoid import hell > >> * Implemented API dealing with containers > >> * All classes from Gui, OpenGL, Xml, Svg, Network and Webkit packages > >> are wrapped > >> * Build system is now based on CMake to be crossplatform and more > >> flexible > >> * New signals and slots implementation (pretty limited but we are > >> working on a better one, which will support queued connections, > >> connections by name at runtime, etc). > >> * Ported duic, the tool for generating code out of xml representation > >> * Ported drcc, the resources compiler > >> > >> Thanks to everyone involved in the project. > > > > So apparently I made it working on Windows as well. The thing that solved > > the problem was to feed source files to the compiler in the different > > order. Is it a correct behaviour? > > > > The DMD frontend has quite a few "order dependencies". It's not > correct behaviour, but a result of how it does semantics.
Why is it working on linux then? With both ldc and dmd?
