"Nick Sabalausky" <a...@a.a> wrote in message news:hadst9$58...@digitalmars.com... > "Walter Bright" <newshou...@digitalmars.com> wrote in message > news:hadqcs$30n...@digitalmars.com... >> BCS wrote: >>> Hello Walter, >>> >>>> #ponce wrote: >>>> >>>>> I think it's disabled in debug mode to keep the compilation time low. >>>>> >>>> That, and the optimizer tends to scramble the relationship between >>>> source and assembler, making source debugging next to impossible. >>>> >>> >>> How hard would it be to have the code generate run on the unoptimized >>> code and then do the optimizer backed test and only if no bugs jump out, >>> move the results into the object file? >>> >> >> It seems even easier to just compile with -0. > > It isn't. *Very* typical workflow: > [stuff] > > None of those are particularly good options, and I don't see any other > possibilities. >
...Plus it's just plain unintuitive.
