On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 12:54:16 -0500, Lutger <lutger.blijdest...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Michal Minich wrote:
On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 10:23:07 -0500, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I want to focus more on the fact that you are declaring the data after
the slice as being no longer used.
kind of assumeUnique ...
assumeNoArrayReference ?
I like that. Or assumeNoMemoryAliasing. It should be clear that it is a
potentially very unsafe function.
I like this train of thought, assume is a good term for what you are
doing, and it is consistent with assumeUnique.
The only thing I don't like about it is you aren't really assuming
anything about the slice, you are assuming the data after the slice is no
longer used. It looks weird that you are assuming something about the
slice.
assumeEndOfData ?
assumeAllocation ?
I don't 100% like those either.
-Steve
