(Note that SHOO means "code" where he says "cord". "Code" and "cord" are both コード in Japanese, so it's easy for Japanese folks to get the two words mixed up.)
--bb 2010/5/13 SHOO <zan77...@nifty.com>: > SHOO さんは書きました: >> I make std.time module for Phobos. This module provides Time, Span, >> Clock, StopWatch and some utility functions for time operation. >> I hope combine this module to Phobos instead of std.date. >> >> download is here: >> http://j.mp/95aS1K (== http://dusers.dip.jp/ ... /time.d) >> http://j.mp/9p5DDu (patch for Phobos's trunk r1481) >> http://ideone.com/eiQ19 (for code view) >> >> Besides, is there the necessary function? (This module lacks the >> daylight saving time handling, because of a lack of my understanding.) >> >> >> I talk about the process that reached making... >> >> Tango is great library for D1. I am Tango user and I am indebted to >> Tango well. But Tango has some probrems. >> >> - Tango's license is BSD lisence or AFL. This license is incompatible to >> Phobos's Boost license. >> - The specification is disregarded, for example Object.dispose and string. >> - Tango supports only D1 >> - In particular, deep regret is to have split resources of D into two >> halves. >> >> If possible, I want to migrate to D2. And I want to be separated from >> Tango. However, some functions are insufficient for Phobos compared with >> Tango. >> The std.date module is one of the list of dissatisfaction to Phobos. >> I summarize my (and some of Japanese users's) opinion following: >> >> - I want to handle it as another thing for the time and the time span. >> - I want a more structural class for time operating. >> - std.date is a bit buggy... >> >> By these reasons, I made std.time module as the first step of the >> contribution for Phobos. > > Too late to update std.time, but... > > > My old code was represented infringing Tango's license. > (See: > http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives/digitalmars/D/announce/Masahiro_Nakagawa_and_SHOO_invited_to_join_Phobos_developers_18108.html > ) > > > Therefore, I checked and rewrote some codes for excluding code that may > infringe Tango. > > This: http://ideone.com/M2zB7 > > I checked it carefully. And I clarified an origin of source of all > cords. (Check "Note:" tags.) > I hereby made clear that this module does not include the cord which > infringes Tango. > > The interface referred to ptime and time_duration of Boost. (I think > others are rather complicating for standard library.) > By this reason, I changed some names. (Span to Duration) > > If this contribution is turned down, I give up std.time. >
