On Wed, 19 May 2010 06:45:42 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: > On Tue, 18 May 2010 14:10:05 -0400, Moritz Warning > <moritzwarn...@web.de> wrote: > >> On Tue, 18 May 2010 14:24:40 +0000, superdan wrote: >> >>> == Quote from Steven Schveighoffer (schvei...@yahoo.com)'s article >>>> On Tue, 18 May 2010 09:39:12 -0400, superdan <su...@dan.org> wrote: >>>> > guys go with boost and std.gregorian n shit. sorry shoo. tango is a >>>> > fucking boat anchor for d. shit. >>>> Having written most of the API for tango.time, I sorta like it :) I >>>> really like the API that SHOO came up with based on it. If there's >>>> any way to get SHOO's code into Phobos, I want to pursue that first. >>>> If this fails, we can go with boost. >>>> -Steve >>> >>> i feel ya bro. i once sorta liked a hoe with herpes. >>> >>> way i c it is simple. it's fucking dates and fucking times. wut the >>> fuck. ain't a fucking operating system. no matter how u dress a pig u >>> still call it a fucking pig. if u have da datetime functionality it >>> don't matter to be cute. we is wasting time sucking lars douche's cock >>> 2 give us permission 2 his fucking shit. fuck that shit. dis must be >>> da least amount of power that got to some idiot's head. >> >> Wut? >> >> Person A wrote some code and had a look at code from person B. Now >> person C says that A need to get permission from B so that C can use >> the code from A. >> The reason is because the license of the code written by B isn't quite >> compatible with the license recently chosen by C. >> >> And now you are calling B an idiot/douche for that reason? > > Let's make it a bit clearer. Person A *used* the code from person B, > and used the *documentation* of said code to write his own similar > library. Person A has not claimed that he looked at the source. I agree, that's more accurate.
> Person B claims that it is impossible to do so without actually looking at the > source, but has not yet cited any specific copying. Person C doesn't > want any trouble, and just is being extra careful. Afaik, Person B haven't looked at the source in question but relied on what others said. I think it was a move forward in anticipation to Person Cs license sensibility. Anyway, Person B haven't hesitated when asked to give permission himself. > I don't really like the situation, but if this is the way it has to be, > then let's get it done and move on. right :) > -Steve