On 10/12/2010 09:49 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 10/12/10 13:20 CDT, Max Samukha wrote:
As there is interest in the project, we have decided to proceed. Stay
tuned.

Awesome news! I think we need to take the hiccup as a warning to be more
mindful of compilers and library bugs reported on behalf of QtD.

Andrei

Thanks! I find it reasonable to lower our expectations of the language/tools for a while. I've decided to go on without const and other goodies like the scarcely implemented "alias this".

For now, the most important for me are the issues with struct lifetime management. For example, destructors should be called on global struct instances. And this one is critical:

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3516

It would be great if we soon had a complete and debugged implementation of the struct semantics described in TDPL.

Reply via email to