On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 10:34:18 -0500, Johannes Pfau <s...@example.com> wrote:

Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 09:00:21 -0500, Johannes Pfau <s...@example.com>
wrote:

Walter Bright wrote:
David Wang wrote:
Dear Walter,

I went to the github and try to download the source, I found that
the latest version on github is the old version.

for example:

druntime - Downloads: dmd-2.042
Phobos -   Downloads: phobos-2.046
DMD -      Downloads: dmd-2.046

I think the actural latest version of D should be 2.051.

Why github can not showing the 2.051 version(dmd, phobos,
druntime, and so on.) ?

I think it is because the tags were never done properly on svn,
either.

It's still possible to add the tags (see
http://progit.org/book/ch2-6.html "Tagging Later") but we'd have to
know the commits used for the releases. I guess there's
no easy way to figure out which commits were used for the releases?


All source is included in the compiler.  It's simply a matter of doing
a directory compare of the code against source control.  The date
released should narrow it down to a manageable level.

I have done it in the past
(http://www.dsource.org/projects/druntime/changeset/272)  In fact, it
looks like I was the last one to tag druntime :)

Some script-fu could probably fill in all the holes automatically...

-Steve

OK, here are some revisions:
DMD:
2.051 seems to be revision 1374ba96fa5516d9595fa61b09015197a8b84385
  Note: The changelog on the website says release date Nov 7 but it's
  more like 20th December.

That is probably a doc bug. When creating the 'next' version in the changelog, Walter arbitrarily puts a date in there as a placeholder (usually the date he does that), and looks like he forgot to change it. Probably we should get into the practice of putting TBD instead of a date.

  Note2: The git repository contains a object.h file in that revision
  which isn't in the dmd zip.
2.050 50fb3d60811b203ac50a0d9169bf15a28881c9b5
  Note: The git repository contains a argtypes.c file in that revision
  which isn't in the dmd zip.
2.049 ab38d58ecb78924d631f7f77863fff2a6c234eb6
2.048 bcf720fe079fd979fa9e81f63ab2de3dde9284dc
2.047 ad4ae4a4fd3dbdb591ebc288378a7200d2ed6d48
  Note: In the dmd zip, there are 7 additional lines in
  root/root.c. Those were later added to the repository, but
  ad4ae4a4fd3dbdb591ebc288378a7200d2ed6d48 seems to be the correct
  commit.

At this point, I would say, tag those versions. Its very unlikely that someone ever needs one of these old revs anyways. I'm glad you were able to do all this work, thanks!

-Steve

Reply via email to