Nick Sabalausky Wrote: > official public repo: r184 > official public repo: r185 > ...etc. > > Versus: > > 9f4e5ac4f0a3 > 13cf8da225ce > ...etc. > > I don't know about other people, but I find the former to be far more > readable, far more descriptive, and actually possible to reason about. Sure, > the latter can be copy-pasted and it still refers to the same changeset, but > other then that it's meaningless gibberish.
A little example: today I commited changeset 35912, and 35780 - 10 day ago. Try to recall these random-looking numbers after reading a couple of posts in this NG.
