dsimcha Wrote:
> The problem with the with statement idea is that you still need to
> declare the variable. I often throw up quick anonymous plots with
> anonymous Figure objects, like:
>
> Histogram(someDataSet).toFigure
> .title("A Title")
> .xLabel("Stuff")
> .showAsMain();
It's also easier to debug code if you store objects in variables. What if
histogram is created with a bug, how would you diagnose it? If you have the
histogram stored in a variable, you can put a breakpoint after the assignment
and inspect the histogram, but your example doesn't provide a variable to
inspect.
