On 4/10/2011 8:28 PM, Daniel Gibson wrote:
Am 10.04.2011 00:27, schrieb Torarin:
2011/4/8 dsimcha<dsim...@yahoo.com>:
Here's a first draft of an article on D's approaches to concurrency and
parallelism for D's article contest. It's not an official submission yet,
but feedback would be appreciated.
http://davesdprogramming.wordpress.com/2011/04/07/7/
A very good article! And I like that you linked to other articles that
go into more detail on relevant subjects. I wouldn't mind a couple
more examples.
Torarin
After all the language bikeshedding I'll add something on-topic to this
thread ;)
I agree with Torarin: It's a very good article, I like how further
explanations are linked and I also wouldn't mind some more examples.
Some additional notes:
* A link to the std.parallelism docs would make sense
Good idea.
* "This means that no data that is not either immutable or shared may
be transitively reachable via pointers or references passed into a
spawned function or passed as a message." is a strange sentence with
those two negations in it.
Yeah, this could be worded a little better. Will change.
* Maybe you could compare std.parallelism to OpenMP in terms of syntax
and functionality? That would probably help all the people that are
familiar with it.
A few others have asked for this, but honestly, I don't know much about
OpenMP. I've read a little about it but never actually used it before,
so I don't think I could write a solid comparison.
Cheers,
- Daniel
