> 
> Ok, so if this "tango" will be quite different than the original one, is not 
> a good idea to change its name? Just to make it more "clear" and less 
> "confusing". "Tango2" is enough, I think.
> 

Yes, but phobos is called "phobos" instead of phobos2. I'll think about
it ;-).

Reply via email to