On Wed, 22 Feb 2012 22:54:19 +0400 Denis Shelomovskij <verylonglogin....@gmail.com> wrote:
> OK, I'm here again. Jacob Carlborg is right - CWrap is a different > tool so it's incorrect to compare it with SWIG/dstep. It's developed > as a high performance backend for other tools or for manual wrapping > a couple of functions, not for translating entire *.h files or > creating class hierarchy. Thank you for clarification. The doc page just says: "Stuff for automated wrapping functions written in C." So I thought it's meant for binding whole libs. However, I still believe that having dstep producing CWrap output would be beneficial for those having task to provide D bindings for C libs with customized D-ish API. Sincerely, Gour -- But a person free from all attachment and aversion and able to control his senses through regulative principles of freedom can obtain the complete mercy of the Lord. http://atmarama.net | Hlapicina (Croatia) | GPG: 52B5C810
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature