On Tuesday, July 03, 2012 21:55:47 bearophile wrote: > So maybe it's worth accepting this limitation, to reduce > confusion for the people the read the code.
I would give a resounding no on that one. The confusion on how to actually manage to be able to use your member function would t hen be even greater, and if you need lots of other stuff from the module which provides the offending free function, then _not_ importing it becomes a royal pain. I think that the current approach works just fine. - Jonathan M Davis
