Adam Wilson, el 16 de July a las 10:56 me escribiste: > >So if I were to represent a theoretical merge sequence in ascii: > > > > ... former releases ... > > DMD Development GDC Development > > >---- DMD 2.060 release ----> > > | | > > DMD Development DMD 2.060.1 release > > v v > > | | > > | DMD 2.060.2 release > > | v > > | | > > | DMD 2.060.3 release > > | v > > | | > > DMD 2.061 beta DMD 2.060.4 release > > v v > > | | > > DMD 2.061 RC DMD 2.060.5 release > > v v > > | | > > >-- DMD 2.061 release ------> > > > > > >Would this be a correct way of utilising this new process? > > > > I'd say mostly correct. The last step is the one where we might
Mmm, this makes me wonder if the stable releases based on a particular official release will live only until the next official release is out, or if they will be long-term. I thought it was the later, so people don't have to worry about bugs related to new features they don't care about, but now I'm not so sure. -- Leandro Lucarella (AKA luca) http://llucax.com.ar/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- GPG Key: 5F5A8D05 (F8CD F9A7 BF00 5431 4145 104C 949E BFB6 5F5A 8D05) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ACCIDENTE FATAL EN FLORES, MUEREN DOS PERSONAS Y UN BOLIVIANO -- Crónica TV