On 2012-08-02 00:23, David wrote:
I think the best way here is to define a BufferedRange that takes any
other range and supplies a buffer for it (with the appropriate
primitives) in a native array.

Andrei

Don't you think, this range stuff is overdone? Define some fancy Range
stuff, if an array just works perfectly?

Ranges > Iterators, yes, but I think they are overdone.



I think so. Some parts of the community seem to be obsessed about ranges.

--
/Jacob Carlborg

Reply via email to