On 01/29/2013 11:29 AM, Dicebot wrote:
Fixing private is enough.
...
No need to screw this up.
By the way, do you oppose exactly "static" keyword usage> or ability to
mark symbols for internal linkage at all? How about something like
@internal?
I only oppose changing the meaning of "static". I do not have any strong
feelings about being able to mark symbols for internal linkage, but I do
not see why it is necessary. Can't a compiler just mark all symbols for
internal linkage that can be marked such given the constraints you would
impose on @internal marked symbols?
