On 5/23/2013 7:57 PM, bearophile wrote:
Walter Bright:
Even if such "naive" D programmers exist, maybe it's better to ignore this third
point, because they will not be able to program in D for other reasons.
s/naive/tired/
s/naive/inahurry/
I'm surprised at you, bearophile!
A safe and well designed language is not supposed to save you from using on
purpose a switch designed to avoid you some bugs. So I don't agree with this
third point of yours.
I think that is inconsistent with your consistent position that features that
are easily misunderstood or misused should have more protection.
So there!
