SomeDude, el 27 de July a las 20:27 me escribiste: > On Friday, 26 July 2013 at 00:08:21 UTC, Leandro Lucarella wrote: > >Walter Bright, el 25 de July a las 14:27 me escribiste: > >>On 7/25/2013 11:49 AM, Dmitry S wrote: > >>>I am also confused by the numbers. What I see at the end of > >>>the article is > >>>"21.56 seconds, and the latest development version does it in > >>>12.19", which is > >>>really a 43% improvement. (Which is really great too.) > >> > >>21.56/12.19 is 1.77, i.e. a >75% improvement in speed. > > > >This is certainly misleading, is very easy to be confused with a > >time > >reduction of 75%, which one would expect to be 1/4 of the original > >time. > >:) > > No, a division by 4 of the total time would be a 300% improvement in > speed. The article's title looks correct to me.
Again, I never said is incorrect, I said is easily to read it incorrectly, which ends up sending a wrong message. -- Leandro Lucarella (AKA luca) http://llucax.com.ar/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- GPG Key: 5F5A8D05 (F8CD F9A7 BF00 5431 4145 104C 949E BFB6 5F5A 8D05) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Wake from your sleep, the drying of your tears, Today we escape, we escape.