yip, :) can't think of a reason except it was interesting. wish dmd didn't segfault when I used __MODULE__.
on the plus side the requirement for a non basic type is the same requirement that #golang has on its interfaces. On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Dicebot <pub...@dicebot.lv> wrote: > On Wednesday, 4 September 2013 at 10:33:26 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote: > >> I have a basic solution but it can't handle basic types LOL! you have to >> typedef them so that moduleName!T works. >> > > Of course it can't, built-in types don't have any owning module, those are > not symbols. Why would you want to care about basic types anyway? >
