On Mon, 20 Jan 2014 15:16:42 -0800, Robert <jfanati...@gmx.at> wrote:
Thank you Dicebot for stepping up. Unfortunately the demand seems to be
very, very low, so I believe we are going to stick with the old
std.signals.
Thanks again!
Best regards,
Robert
Which is a shame too. We could have definitely used this in Aurora... But
I think Andrei's comments kind of nixed the discussion. :-S
On Monday, 20 January 2014 at 13:51:44 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Monday, 6 January 2014 at 09:11:09 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Some time ago there have been a review for `std.signal` Phobos
proposal
(http://forum.dlang.org/thread/ujlhznaphepibgtpc...@forum.dlang.org#post-ujlhznaphepibgtpcoqz:40forum.dlang.org).
It have not received much feedback and I was a it too busy to proceed
with final voting at that moment but with no outstanding issues to
address nothing prevents that final step.
Let's put 2 week deadline to refresh memories about the proposal and
make some decision. Voting closes at January 20th 23:59 GMT 0
Please take some time and help make Phobos better ;)
Less than 10 hours are left.
--
Adam Wilson
GitHub/IRC: LightBender
Aurora Project Coordinator
