On Sat, 15 Feb 2014 23:53:19 -0500, Denis Koroskin <2kor...@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Sunday, 16 February 2014 at 02:57:25 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I think that the best and quickest approach at this time is to disallow
classes. They are not trivial. If we can figure out a clean way to add
them back, then they can be allowed later.
Note that the same applies to classes with ARC (or other reference
counting mechanism).
Right, but ARC classes would be marked differently or derive from a
different base. Like extern(C++) classes (which actually should work under
minimal D).
What we are debating is allowing just plain-old D classes could compile
and be used under minimal D. I don't think that's a good idea.
-Steve
