Walter Bright, el 26 de May a las 11:09 me escribiste: > On 5/26/2014 10:30 AM, w0rp wrote: > >On Monday, 26 May 2014 at 17:06:27 UTC, Walter Bright wrote: > >>Youtube has solved all these problems - why not use it? > >You can view .webm directly in recent Firefox or Chrome versions on Windows, > >you > >an also view .webm in IE9 and above provided you have the right codecs > >installed. It's a perfectly acceptable format. > > It doesn't work on the browser that comes with Windows. That makes > it undesirable if you wish to reach the largest audience with the > least friction. > > Why restrict the audience if you don't have to? What is gained by > using .webm that would offset the reduced audience?
And there is something magical about digital media. Adding a copy to YouTube doesn't mean your webm copy will vanish. Just have both and everybody is happy. :) -- Leandro Lucarella (AKA luca) http://llucax.com.ar/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- El trabajo no sólo tara, sino que tarará y seguirá tararando. -- Ricardo Vaporeso
