On Monday, 18 August 2014 at 23:07:27 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
i myself using dmd-git-head and heavily ;-) patched gdc, but
when i
tried to convince my co-workers to use D, they looked at the
page with
releases first. not feature list or some comparisons. neither to
"buglist". "as this is relatively young language, it must have
frequent
releases with bugfixes and new features!" they tolerate some
regressions in some releases, but they want to see that
releases.
don't ask me why they thinking like this. i don't know. but
it's the
fact.
Can't it be addressed by publishing release schedule, like llvm
does it, to indicate the work is going on?
