On 21/08/14 10:37, Ola Fosheim Gr wrote:
Now the comma-operator has to stay because removing it is a severe breaking change.
Isn't that multiple arguments to opIndex? -- /Jacob Carlborg
- Re: D for the Win Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: D for the Win eles via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: D for the Win Peter Alexander via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: D for the Win Nick Sabalausky via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: D for the Win ketmar via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: D for the Win Ola Fosheim Gr via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: D for the Win ketmar via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: D for the ... Rory McGuire via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: D for the Win Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: D for the ... Rory McGuire via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: D for the ... Ola Fosheim Gr via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: D for the Win Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: D for the Win bearophile via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: D for the Win Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: D for the Win Andrej Mitrovic via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: D for the Win Dicebot via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: D for the Win Mike via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: D for the Win bearophile via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: D for the Win Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d-announce
