On Friday, 27 March 2015 at 20:20:07 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On 03/26/2015 09:47 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
It seems to me that every significant but one feature of Go
has a pretty
much direct analog in D
I'm no Go expert, but AIUI, Go seems to be one of those
languages that considers *lacking* certain features to *be* a
feature. Ie the whole "minimalism" approach to language design.
For people who value that (not for me personally though), it's
a feature D doesn't offer and deliberately doesn't try to.
there's a difference between minimalism and blatantly not
adopting core advances in language design over the past 40 years.
