On 2015-08-31 08:01, Martin Nowak wrote:
First beta for the 2.068.1 point release (we skipped -b1 due to a bug).
I started compile my projects with DMD 2.068.0 (yes, I know I'm a bit
late). I noted that this piece of code that compiles in 2.067.0 doesn't
compile in 2.068.0 (or 2.068.1-b2) :
class Foo
{
override string toString()
in { }
body
{
return "foo";
}
}
The error message I get is:
main.d(3): Error: function main.Foo.toString cannot have an in contract
when overriden function object.Object.toString does not have an in contract
The above code is a minimal testcase extracted from Tango.
The question is, is this a regression or expected? I suspect it's
expected. The check was added four years ago, although I don't
understand why it hasn't been hit before.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
