On 02-Sep-2015 16:23, Rory McGuire via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Dmitry Olshansky via
Digitalmars-d-announce <digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com
<mailto:digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com>> wrote:


    Because the compiler and library releases go in lockstep we'd have
    to wait for another release cycle to even field-test @nogc. Not
    acceptable really.

    Phobos ends up battle testing every new feature and if it wasn't new
    features will be definitely shipped in a broken state. Let's not
    forget that new D frontend features still have many bugs that stay
    undetected even after testing in Phobos.

    --
    Dmitry Olshansky


Surely the compiler should always rely on the previous compiler +
standard library versions.

Is there really a valid reason not to do this? Surely if the dog food is
so bad no one should be eating?

Anyhow I'd let compiler team decide this.

--
Dmitry Olshansky

Reply via email to