On Friday, October 16, 2015 08:21:32 Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > On 2015-10-16 00:14, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > > > I thought that http://code.dlang.org/packages/std_data_json was the json > > implementation we were looking at adding to Phobos. Or did that fall > > through? I haven't paid much attention to the discussion on that, though I > > have used it in one of my own projects. > > Yes, that was the plan. But if a better alternative shows up, should we > look at that as well?
Sure, but going from std_data_json as being the candidate to talking about putting this other one in std.experimental seems a bit much. It needs to go through the review process first, and if we're doing that, it doesn't make sense to have two winners. They'll have to duke it out (or be merged), and then the one that wins can go in std.experimental. - Jonathan M Davis
