On Saturday, 24 October 2015 at 15:40:41 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
On Saturday, 24 October 2015 at 03:11:30 UTC, Joakim wrote:
The associated travis CI run that finally went green with ldc
0.16.0 beta 2 took about as long as the other D compilers, so
performance of ldc-compiled ddmd seems comparable:
https://travis-ci.org/D-Programming-Language/dmd/builds/85017266
That's surprising given that many were worried that switching
to ddmd would slow compilation speeds down by at least 30%.
Also, this does not seem to be using any of ldc's optimization
flags.
Well, all three of those are ddmd: the only difference is whether
ddmd is compiled by dmd, gdc, or ldc. The 30% measurement was
based on comparing the previously completely C++ dmd with ddmd:
http://forum.dlang.org/post/55c9f77b.8050...@dawg.eu
